Creaturebug and Lifenut both have written posts on reading in the last week. I decided as I was leaving a too-long comment on Gretchen's that I might as well post my opinion here as well; after all, I teach language arts, I ought to have a strong opinion. I ought to be an expert, but I don't think I'm approaching that status yet. What I am is a practicioner, and that will have to count.
Like most L.A. teachers, I chose to teach that subject because I simply love to read and write. Nothing makes me feel as centered and alive, except some aspects of parenting. My reading is so habitual that I can't imagine trying to get through the day without a book open at my side--which is not unique, and I'm not bragging. It's a way of life for me and many other readers. I wanted to share that with my students, of course. I had "Dead Poet's Society" dreams, as I imagine most new teachers do. I had a few of those kinds of teachers, and their ghosts follow me throughout life with a watchful eye, approving, disapproving, best of all, encouraging. But I'm not Robin Williams (have I ever made a more obvious statement?) And the world of public education is nothing like an expensive prep school (okay, maybe that one was more obvious.) Jading of teachers happens amazingly rapidly, it's a kind of oxydation that occurs when exposed to an atmosphere of impossible expectations in which one is expected to remain hopeful. Not only are you dealing with the messiest plate of duties you can imagine, you are supposed to be relishing that plate and its contents, or you run the risk of spreading pessimism, damaging young lives . . . just please don't criticize teachers as a group. They try so very hard.
Back to reading. Creaturebug was talking about teaching reading to the very young. Mopsy was upset that her son's reading program is killing his love for it. Mopsy's readers offered alternatives and advice, including praise of the Accelerated Reader program. Here's what I said:
I hate to be a naysayer, but the AR program doesn't work very well either, in my opinion. It limits kids to books that have tests written for them, sticks them into a "category" of which books they can read, so they aren't allowed to read up or down (which saps the fun out of picking a book), and it's very easy to cheat. Besides, real readers do not take multiple choice tests on the books they read. It's another artifiial construct that excludes kids from the actual life of a reader. I do a weekly reading log with my students--fifteen minutes a night or two hours a week, they can split it how it works for them. They are always encouraged to read more--that's considered the minimum. They can read anything they like--the point is that they have to enjoy it. I do this because studies show that daily reading builds fluency. And any reading is better than no reading, which is what most of my students would do without a requirement. I've tried genre studies requirements (which is what my son has this year), I've tried extensive reading journals, I've tried numbers. No system seems to work much better than another. The high kids will read whether you require them to or not; the low kids won't no matter how it affects their grade. There are exceptions, however, and the requirements are worth it for that, because teaching is, or should be, about reaching the individual, no matter what the masses are up to.
See, education is quite different from when we were growing up, although it was already heading this direction. It's now mostly about bringing the lowest students up to par. And this is supported by research--we want these kids to be educated, have diplomas, etc., because it is better for society. It's also ethical--we want the disadvantaged to succeed. And the obstacles they have to overcome are real: research again, whatever the "buck up and try harder" people say. However, it is very unbalanced and has a definite cost to society as well, the amount of money we put into IEP's and 504's compared to the amount of money we put into the gifted programs is sometimes hard to believe, and then what about the middle kids, who often go through school anonymously? Oh, it's a majorly faulty system, and there are certainly no easy answers--I think about all of this daily as I watch the complex organisms that are my classes grow, change shape, self-destruct, regenerate, etc.
But here is the thing I've been trying this year: I read aloud to every class for at least ten minutes a day out of a book of their choice (they vote). Sometimes they have to write about it, sometimes they get to just listen. We don't have "schoolish" discussions about these books--they are picked for pleasure. They are often the only book a kid will really read all year--those who don't turn in reading logs, who own no books, etc. The kids absolutely love this. They mutiny if I try to skip it. They remember what is read aloud to them far better than what they are forced to read in a textbook. Research supports what I'm doing, but my own life is a bigger influence for me: my mom read aloud to me until I was about twelve, every night. She still read aloud to me later when I was home sick, or when we went on car trips. She loved the books as much as I did. She taught me to love them, not because I watched her reading them on her own (because she rarely had time while I was awake) but because we experienced them together. Research (again) also shows that books come alive when a child makes a connection with the book: I submit they become even more alive when they make a connection with the book and another actual person. "We read to know that we are not alone"--on my bulletin board, courtesy C.S. Lewis. Reading aloud has brought more harmony to my classrooms and deeper connections with my kids, and they will often pick up the sequels or other books in the same genre or by the same author on their own. They also sidle up to my desk to make comments about the book--they stay after class to offer opinions and predictions. Can I tell you how rewarding that is?
So sure, it would be nice if all kids naturally loved books--but there is some stiff competition for their attention out there. It would be even nicer if I had a class of only ten children and could guide them in their reading choices and have individualized daily discussions via chatting or letter about their current reading--that's what is considered best practice right now. But neither of those are realities for most students, so this is what I do: I offer myself and my own love of books up to them. Because they are greedy for that--a connection to an adult, a connection to a life beyond the limits of their own. That they can get that through books may be a novel idea (no pun intended, but it kind of works well, doesn't it?) It's not a perfect system, and I'm not exactly working miracles: I don't think that is a teacher's role, anyway. I'm just trying to crack open some doors, pick some locks, slide a note under: "Hey, try this. You might like it."
Recent Comments